Supplier Spotlight

Show Reviews

Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2017 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2016 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo Europe 2015 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo North America 2014 Show Review

Click here to read


Automotive Testing Expo India 2014 Show Review

Click here to read


Latest Video

Euro NCAP crash footage


Range Rover Velar crash test montage October 2017

Click here to watch the video

Accelerate acoustic troubleshooting


A modular digital microphone array from Siemens PLM Software gives an instant overview of sound sources on any noise-generating object

Click here to watch the video

If you could pick only one, where would you prefer to perform climatic testing?

Industry Opinion

« back to blog listings

Driver-in-the-loop ADAS testing

The increasing adoption of advanced driver assistance systems presents a fascinating challenge for verification and testing engineers. Perhaps more so than any other aspect of a vehicle, this is where the actions of a machine and a human driver become entwined. And it means human beings are a vital part of the test and verification process for vehicles with ADAS.

Ironically, the sheer scope of this technology often means that human input is intentionally reduced in the early stages of verification. If one considers all the possible scenarios that might be presented to a collision avoidance system, for instance, it’s easy enough to conclude that it can lead to hundreds of thousands of combinations that would require scrutiny. Consequently, off-line simulation tools are required to slug through the intense number crunching that is needed to generate all the objective maps and response surfaces required to predict complex behaviors in the early development stages. While this is efficient and productive, purely objective feedback cannot inform vehicle designers about how evaluation drivers might respond to implementations.

So, as soon as objective predictions can be whittled down into a more manageable subset of scenarios it makes good sense to bring human drivers into the test program. After all, people will ultimately decide the success or failure of vehicle features and functions in the marketplace. For example, the point where functions such as ESC or AEB should intervene is highly subjective. These tend to occur in highly dynamic situations, where it’s vital to get representative inputs from a real driver to guard against behavior conflicts.

Driver-in-the-loop (DIL) testing can bring human interaction forward dramatically in a vehicle project’s timescale and can dramatically increase the frequency of driver contact with imagined systems as they are being tuned and developed. Most importantly, this means that potential issues can be identified early on, when they are less costly to address, at a time when physical prototypes might not even be available. Even when prototype vehicles are available they can often be in short supply, and potentially appropriated to other areas for other tests, so a DIL simulation program helps to manage the workload.

Of course, there are a number of other benefits to DIL testing. Chief among these is safety: drivers are free to charge headlong toward oncoming traffic or infrastructure scenarios with no more than pixels put at risk. In fact, one might argue that DIL simulation has the edge over real-world testing in many cases because every detail of the sensor inputs and scene can be scripted and repeated at will, and new ‘what if?’ scenarios are only a keystroke or two away. Things like grip levels and environmental conditions can be modified almost instantaneously or kept absolutely identical across a series of tests.

And, ironically, virtual test driving even offers some advantages in terms of realism when compared with real-world proving ground tests. Real radar signatures, for instance, can be presented to a real sensor (via HiL) and a real driver in a DIL lab, rather than relying on an inflatable obstacle or a cardboard cut-out representation.

Ultimately, though, the value of DIL lab testing hinges on being able to elicit realistic responses and behaviors from human drivers, and that’s not as easy as one might think. Experienced test drivers, who have finely-tuned senses for what real cars feel like in various conditions, are extremely sensitive when their expectations are violated. Such drivers will simply not accept DIL simulators as vehicle development tools if the feedback provided to them is inaccurate. From a DIL simulation perspective it is mission critical to deliver the correct motion cues, correct levels of graphical latency, correct tactile and auditory stimulation, and so on. Engineering DIL simulators is another topic altogether.

As technologies continue to emerge and converge, the task of verifying and testing ADAS systems will invariably become more complex for car makers. Vehicle onboard systems that were previously on the emerging technology list – such as ESC and ABS – are now mandatory in most markets. That is just the tip of the iceberg.

Lane departure warning systems and AEB are now legal requirements on all new heavy goods vehicles registered in Europe. It is thought that this is likely to extend to passenger cars and light commercials before too long (where ADAS systems already contribute to the much-publicized Euro NCAP safety ratings). Meanwhile, in the USA, the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration), the IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) and most of the nation’s OEMs have announced an informal agreement to make AEB standard by 2022.

All this means that auto makers will be tackling a lot more testing and development work in order to deploy these (and other) ADAS systems. It won’t stop there either. Partial autonomy is already creeping into the car industry and this, perhaps ironically again – since driverless cars do not require ‘drivers’ per se – is another area where DIL simulators are helping the cause. With regard to the all-important handovers to and from human drivers and autonomous running modes, DIL simulators are proving to be the go-to tool. If we were to sneak a peek behind the auto industry’s R&D curtain, what might we surmise? Well, one thing is for certain – it’s certainly a busy time.

January 31, 2017



There are currently no comments.

If you would like to post a comment about this blog, please click here.
Read Latest Issue
Read Latest Issue

Web Exclusives

The importance of software engineering

Tier 1 supplier GKN’s software and electronics manager, Michael Schomisch, discusses how software development is becoming increasingly important in vehicle testing
Click here to read more

Daimler reveals how the GLC F-Cell went from testing to production

With the Mercedes GLC F-Cell SUV unveiled at Frankfurt this week, Daimler has revealed the extensive testing process the first production plug-in hydrogen-powered car was put through
Click here to read more

Speaker Q&A: Jerry Beeney, FLIR Systems

The business development manager, who will be presenting at Automotive Testing Expo in Novi, Michigan, discusses current measurement tools and techniques used to measure high-speed targets, including thermal cameras and contact and non-contact temperature measurement systems.
Click here to read more

Conti celebrates 50th anniversary of the Contidrom

The German tire giant looks back on 50 years of testing and development at its flagship facility
Click here to read more

Cruden launches new simulator technology

The system designed for ADAS and autonomous vehicle testing enables engineers to add as much hardware- or software-in-the-loop as they wish
Click here to read more

Supplier Spotlight

Supplier SpotlightClick here for listings and information on leading suppliers covering all aspects of the automotive testing industry. Want to see your company included? Contact for more details.

فروشگاه اینترنتی فروشگاه اینترنتی سیستم همکاری در فروش ماهواره آنلاین اندروید کانال تلگرام چت روم دانلود فیلم فروشگظ;ه اینترنتی

Submit your industry opinion

Industry BlogDo you have an opinion you'd like to share with the automotive testing community? Good or bad, we'd like to hear your views and opinions on the leading issues shaping the industry. Share your comments by sending up to 500 words to


Recruitment AdTo receive information on booking an advertising banner please email